Judge halts Racine’s COVID-19 ordinance, says Racine ‘engaged in direct attack’ on court’s order – Journal Times

25June 2020

{{featured_button_text}}

RACINE — A Racine County Circuit Court judge has again halted the city’s enforcement of its COVID-19 restrictions and put the city on notice it could be in contempt of court in the future if the city again attempts to “undermine the orders of the court.”

On Wednesday, Judge Jon Fredrickson issued a temporary injunction order, suspending enforcement of the city’s new “Safer Racine” ordinance.

The Racine City Council passed the ordinance on Monday night, three days after Fredrickson on Friday issued an injunction order halting enforcement of the city’s “Forward Racine” order.

The judge last Friday ruled the Forward Racine order could not be enforced while a lawsuit challenging the order worked its way through court. Racine’s original order was put in place by Public Health Administrator Dottie-Kay Bowersox on May 13, just after the state Supreme Court struck down Wisconsin’s Safer at Home order. Bowersox issued Forward Racine, an updated order, on May 26.

Following the judge’s temporary halt to Bowersox’s order on Friday, the City Council on Monday voted basically the exact same restrictions into law via a city ordinance.

The new court order issued Wednesday says, “The City of Racine has engaged in a direct attack on this Court’s order by incorporating the enjoined substance of the Forward Racine order into an ordinance, and then claiming the right to enforce the enjoined language through a new ordinance, despite this Court’s order.”

It goes on to say, “Pursuant to this Court’s last order, both Defendants were enjoined from enforcing the substantive portion of the Forward Racine order. When issued, that meant both Defendants were barred from forcing the residents, faith organizations, and businesses in the City of Racine to comply with the Forward Racine Order while the constitutional and statutory power to issue such orders, as well as the constitutionality and statutory breadth and scope of the orders, remain at issue in this case.

“Instead of complying, Defendants cut and pasted the challenged language at issue in this case into a new ordinance that they are now enforcing. Strike One.”

It goes on to state: “Going forward, this Court warns Defendants that it will not hesitate to issue an order to show cause for contempt if any one, or both, of Defendants attempt to undermine the orders of this Court. There are no strikes two, or three, in this court.”

The lawsuit

The co-owners of Harbor Park CrossFit, David and Corian Yandel, filed the civil suit against Bowersox and the City of Racine on May 21. The suit alleges that Bowersox’s order would “lead to the likely closure of the business” due to “significant loss of revenue and loss of customers.”

The suit asks the court to find the city’s COVID-19 restrictions “unlawful, invalid and unenforceable.”

The Forward Racine order, enacted May 26, allowed gyms in Racine to reopen but restricted them to only 10 customers inside at any time, or 25% of capacity, whichever is larger.

It also placed restrictions on other businesses such as restaurants, bowling alleys, wedding venues and many more sectors.

Journal Times reporter Caitlin Sievers contributed to this story.

Our Score
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]
Contents

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upgrade Your Listing

Add images, video, and more details to your listing! More information means more clicks. More clicks means more quotes!

Free listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, google map

Upgraded listing includes: business name, address, phone, website, EMAIL ADDRESS, COMPANY LOGO, VIDEO, IMAGE SLIDE SHOW, FEATURED LISTING PLACEMENT